|
I FOUND MY SHABAK INFORMER I was supposed to be speaking at a school in Zichron
Yaacov on Nov. 28. My subject was to be, The Corruption Of Israeli
Democracy By Outsiders. My organizer called this morning to inform me that
the school had just called. It seems the Ministry Of Education ordered
them to cancel my lecture. How the Ministry even knew it was scheduled in
one little school of theirs among thousands is proof that someone in
government is following my activities. If you think the Ministry has a lot
of nerve hushing me, write the Minister, Limor Livnat and tell her so at
sar@education.gov.il Now I'm
really gonna get even because I'm going to name my Shabak informer.
I'm just one of her responsibilities. She shows up at literally every right wing or "subversive" meeting everywhere in the country. She pretends to be an airhead who is interested in Israel's interests, if you explain things to her ever so slowly. There was a period when she'd call me monthly to get the latest news and I couldn't get her off the phone. So I amused myself by expanding grandly on the truth, with her taking notes and taping me on the other end of the line. But I didn't suspect she was an agent, even when my book Israel Betrayed was just published and I told her I had some very serious evidence within that exonerates Baruch Goldstein from massacre responsibility. She seemed to panic and said she had to have the book right away. I asked why, since she didn't read English. She thought about it and said she had to give it to an American friend. Within a few hours, she had dug up a new American friend and they were at my door buying the book. For a period, she was staking out Dr. Uri Milstein's lectures and the two times I showed up, she was there. She asked to be driven home both times and she pumped me for information all the way to her neighborhood. Two weeks ago I bought a new old car from a friend in America. He kept it in Israel and used a friend to deliver the car and the papers to me. I was warned that the engine is rebuilt but the doors have flaws in the locks. Last Thursday, I was on my way to Jerusalem to sell books outside the Moledet Party 13th birthday celebration at the Jerusalem Theatre. I packed my wares but the door wouldn't close and I forgot the trick that makes the lock work. So the lady who arranged the sale met me to show me the lock trick. The agent saw us together and got excited. "She is your girlfriend, right?"she announced in joy. I equally joyfully acknowledged this, watched her reaction and then pointing to the car said, "Come on. I bought that car from her." The lady had a headache and asked the informer if she had a painkiller. She said she didn't but she'd go arrange one for her. Ten minutes later she was back and beckoned the lady away to get the painkiller she had found. The informer said, "I don't really have the pill but I know who you are. You're..." And then gave the last name of the American I had bought the car from. And it only took her ten minutes to get the license number of the car, call it in, and get the name of the owner. That's the only way it could have happened. She didn't pull the right name out of a hat. At last, the name of the informer: It is IRIS COHEN! Israeli political activists: Say nothing to her. It won't be hard to resist her dubious charms. If you don't, every word you say will be recorded at Shabak headquarters. *** Letters To The Editor, Actually To Me *** Could anyone anywhere have such visionary readers? They view the world so clearly. Take the first comment as a typical case in point. In my last sendout I surmised that Yossi Beilin's unnamed assistant at the secret British conference to undermine Israel's democracy was the notorious Shlomo Gur, the "assistant" (wink, wink) who set up Beilin's secret Vatican pipeline in 1994. Not so, insists this reader/researcher.*** Look at the movements of the EU Solara (Foreign Minister), Spain was the latest holder of the presidency of the EU and finally the movements of Lord Michael Abraham Levy (Blair's private foreign minister), his movements and meetings with Arafat and associates and his tie up with Beilin - Daniel Levy is Belin's chief assistant and son of Lord Levy!!! There has been a lot of muck about Lords Levy in the Sunday Times (London) recently- it appears his contacts with certain persons through "philanthropic Jewish connections" has led him to many contacts and funds. It could be worth checking it out. In this week's London Jewish Chronicle there is an Opinion Piece by Professor Aldman who states the Lord Levy was on the liste of invitees to Beilin's, Burg and Chazan recent meeting in N.Ireland and the UK with the PLO! *** Dawn Party Leader Yossi Beilin's secret diplomacy with the Jesuit-controlled Vatican through his "assistant" Shlomo Gur and the illuminati "rabbi" David Rosen are revealed by a faithful correspondent.*** Now guess who is responsible for many of these Scriptural changes with beginnings in Rome......none other than the Jesuit priest, Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini himself who is found in your last e-mail http://www.jrep.com/Pope/a.html "The diplomatic agreement between Israel and the Vatican as states set the stage for a public demonstration of Jewish-Christian reconciliation, organized by Rosen. In February, the rabbi convened an international Jewish-Christian conference in Jerusalem, bringing together over 400 Jewish and Christian religious leaders from more than 80 countries. Among them were Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger of the Vatican, Italy's Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini (who many predict will be the next pope), and George Carey, the Archbishop of Canterbury". AND guess what he is heading to "retire" ~~~~~~~~Jerusalem! http://user.online.be/~sj.eur.news/ns/arch01.htm#0909 Jesuit Cardinal Martini of Milan to Retire in February "I do not keep secret my desire, expressed to the Pope, to retire to Jerusalem to dedicate myself to prayer and the study of codes and manuscripts," the Jesuit cardinal revealed. I would say Israel, "LOOK OUT"! The "new dawn" that is coming may be different than you think. *** A Russian-born professor responds to my new information proving Baruch Goldstein did not shoot up a Hebron mosque in February, '94. She followed the Shamgar Commission Of Inquiry Into The Hebron Massacre and, back in 1994, knew something very fishy was taking place. *** Barry, following your new information about Baruch Goldstein: 1. I remember very well the testimony of Rotem Revivi at the Shamgar Comission which I listened to on the radio. It was so clear and interesting, that I repeated his words several times to my friends. So I have no doubt that he said the following things-- He, Rotem Revivi was at all the times near the entrance to Izhak hall. And he did not see that Goldstein (B.G.) entered the hall. He insisted that Goldstein did not enter Izhak hall! It was even more interesting that on the same day or a day before we could hear a representative of WAKF (Arab Religious Council), who insisted that B.G. entered the hall with weapon and used force when that Arabs tried to stop him. He merely pushed them away. (The Shamgar Comission later accused this Arab of giving false evidence). Revivi insisted that he did not see such a scene of struggle between B.G. and that man from the WAKF. If the WAKF witness in fact was telling the truth, he was saying that Revivi could not have been in the hall. 2. Revivi's testimony, if accurate, means Goldstein arrived earlier, was guided to another room, and another man in an officer's uniform came at 5:20 and did the shooting. He escaped and Goldstein replaced him. (Complicated but not impossible). 3. In the same testimony Revivi, the officer on duty, said that he was the first who entered the hall after shooting. And he did not see the body of B.G. Only when he entered the hall the second time after some time did he see a body ("buba in modin" - he said) in the corner not far from the door to Josefia = misgad ha nashim. As you remember Josefia (= misgad ha nashim) was closed from outside the Izhak hall, i.e. inside of Josefia. *** With so many informants, who needs to do original research? How did I miss this telling ad? So let us ask why the American Embassy is asking for Israeli contractors to build a base near Jerusalem? *** Hello, Please let me draw your attention to an ad, which appeared in English, in Marriv, last Friday. The ad is on behalf of U.S. Embassy (in Germany). They ask for contractors for construction of an American military base in Israel, near Jerusalem. The ad appears in "Asaqim" (Business) supplement, on page 14. What do you make of it? Is it a Trojan horse? *** A reader with an intelligence past and a few chilling stories to recall it by, wants to know who got the contracts to build the new security fence to protect the country from suicide bombers. "This new Maginot Line will cost a quarter of a billion bucks and if you dig a bit, you'll find contractors tied to with Sharon and Ben Eliezer building it. Another devoted reader and keen observor, Joel Skousen, has this to say about the fence:*** If the government were going to build a fence for security reasons, it would not choose the Green Line as a basis, which leaves no buffer zone or distance between conflicting groups. The Green Line also runs right through Jerusalem and puts numerous Israeli settlements outside the security fence, which will have to be protected as enclaves. It is obvious to many Israelis that the construction of this fence will create a de facto boundary upon which future peace negotiations will be based. Indeed, savvy Israelis fear its construction is setting up the nation for a new US peace process intended to confine Israel to the borders its own government is now so conveniently demarcating. I think one of the reasons Sharon came to Washington recently was to coordinate this new plan for giving in to a Palestinian state with Israeli defense policy. The new Green Line security fence is almost certainly a planned part of this approach to get a foot in the phony "peace" door. Without public discussion, the Sharon government decided to put up an expensive $21,000 /mile "security fence" and just happened to pick the Green Line as the location. In the near future, they will have a convenient fait accompli in this de facto border that the Israeli people will have already gotten used to as a "natural boundary" for the new state. ***I was somewhat deluged with the following item. The implication is that Israeli security personnel are supplying the enemy with at least some their weapons.*** Jerusalem Post UPDATE, June 17, 2002 Police Probe Complaint That Confiscated Settler's Gun Ended up in Jenin Terrorists' Hands Police said Monday there were investigating a complaint from the Hebron Jewish Community that a gun confiscated from a reservist officer was found recently in the possession of Palestinians in Jenin. About a year ago, the police took the weapon away from Capt. (res.) Avner Gilboa during a protest in Kiryat Arba against the slaying of two community members, Hebron area news agencies said. Recently the IDF found the gun among the weapons of Palestinian terror suspects in Jenin. ***I have an Arab Sheikh on my list. Like me, he is convinced the anti-Arabist CFR member Daniel Pipes is nothing but an intelligence stooge, working hand in hand with the Council On Foreign Relations to further their global ambitions. The following two letters show amazement that Pipes has come so blatantly out of the closet. Now I'll say it with certainty: Daniel Pipes is fooling the Jews. Daniel Pipes has no allegiance to or love of Israel. He does what the CFR orders him to do, and nothing more or less. After reading the following with unfettered astonishment, write Pipes and demand to know who is funding his policy institute and his magazine no one reads yet professes to be an influential voice of the Jewish conservative community. Who is behind Pipes? Who are his donors? If he doesn't agree to name his financers, then quit reading him. He's dangerous. If he does, I'll be happy to check them off my CFR member list. Either way, he's a fraud.*** Dear Barry, Sheikh Abdul Hadi received an advance copy of the September, 2002 (Fall) issue of The Middle East Quarterly (Pipes' rag). To his astonishment, it includes an entire verbatim C.F.R. document on "solving" the Middle East problem with commentary by MEQ editors. AHP points out that they present it like a text of the Torah with rabbinic commentaries on Scripture! God bless scanners: here is the document. My impression is that Pipes & Co. are telling the CFR: "Your task force could do a good job... but that's not enough! You have 'experts' but need something more: the superexperts (ourselves)!". It seems a inter-CFR war for the control of propaganda (sorry, "public diplomacy"). This could should also explain why newspapers are running to glorify Lewis, Ajami, Pipes, the highest scholars in the history of humanity! It is really comic that the MEQ experts in manipulations and plagiarism refer to themselves as "serious professional journalists and scholars, who seek the facts and don't simply twist them to it their political prejudices." ---------------------------------- COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS IMPROVING U.S. PUBLIC DIPLOMACY Editors' preface: In the aftermath of September 11, the United States government, the media, and the American public were taken aback by Muslim and Arab expressions of support for Usama bin Ladin and by the intensity of anti-American incitement in the Middle East and South Asia. "Why do they hate us?" many, asked. Perhaps the United States had failed to put its message persuasively before the Muslim world. In U.S. government parlance, the information effort to explain America's case is culled "public diplomacy." After September 11, many voices called for a massive augmentation of American "public diplomacy," which critics argued had been neglected and under-funded. The State Department sought to demonstrate the importance of the issue when it named Charlotte Beers, a renowned advertising executive, as undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs. She was sworn in on October 2. Enter the Council on Foreign Relations, the New York-based clearing-house for international affairs and U.S.foreign policy and publisher of Foreign Affairs. The Council moved immediately after 9//l to establish an "Independent Task Force on America's Response to Terrorism," which began deliberations on American "public diplomacy." The task force included what the council described as "a bipartisan group of individuals with experience at the highest levels of national security policy." On November 6, 2001, the task force issued a report entitled "Improving the U.S. Public Diplomacy Campaign in the War against Terrorism." Tile document is an important statement of conventional thinking in the American policy elite at a moment of crisis. Its recommendations were based on what life report described as a "strong and meaningful consensus" of task force members. Yet despite its august auspices, it is a profoundly controversial statement. Most notable, the recommendations argue for partial privatization of the "public diplomacy" campaign in the hands of highly interested domestic constituencies and urge entrusting its implementation of U.S. efforts to foreign "proxies" - including America's critics. The debate over the direction of "public diplomacy" is not an academic one. In mid-March, House International Affairs Committee chairman Henry J. Hyde (R-Ill.) and committee member Tom Lantos (D-Calif.) introduced the "Freedom Promotion Act 2002" (H.R. 3909), which would build a budgetary firewall around the State Department's "public diplomacy" activities and fund them at level of $497 million. The Bush administration has already expressed serious reservations about aspects of the bill. The content and control of "public diplomacy" is becoming a matter of widening debate. Below are excerpts from the task force's report, followed by comments by several of the Middle East Quarterly's editors and editorial board members (in italics). As the comments suggest, the issues surrounding "public diplomacy" remain contentious.''The "consensus" of the task force represents only one point on the spectrum of informed ideas about how the United States should explain itself and its actions to the world. *** What would this sendout be without more on the EU and the Jesuit-trained King Juan Carlos of Spain, the man really pulling the strings in the Middle East? *** http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=178966&contrassID=1‚EU leaders call for early Mideast peace conference Sat Jun 22,2002 -- European Union leaders, ending a 2-day summit, called Saturday for the early convening of an international peace conference on the Middle East, warning the region had reached a "dramatic turning point." In a statement issued after a particularly deadly week in Israel and the Palestinian territories, the European leaders declared they stand "ready to contribute fully to peace-building", and to the reconstruction of the Palestinian economy. It also said an international peace conference - jointly hosted by the EU, the U.S., the U.N., and Russia - was needed to discuss security, political and economic issues. It must also "re-affirm the parameters of a political solution and establish a realistic and well-defined timescale." "We need a quick initiative," Javier Solana, the EU's foreign and security policy chief told reporters after the summit. EU, Russia, US, UN....... And the common denominator is......? Putin (Russia) met last Sept. 4 and 5th/01 privately one day apart with Ariel Sharon and King Juan Carlos of Spain (EU) respectively, as seen from previous Pravda articles Powell (US)met with King Juan Carlos of Spain (EU)April 10/02 Now on May 3, 2002 Annan (UN) and King Juan Carlos (EU)..... http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/020503/2002050303.html "...one of the options was an invitation by Annan and the Spanish King Juan Carlos of 60 Palestinians, Israeli, Syria and international figures to convene a conference in Spain to be split to five working groups in charge of discussing the files of Jerusalem, the borders, settlements, the security and refugees by the beginning of this month ( May) but the Israeli invasion of the Palestinian territories postponed this option". Emphasis here is on "postponed"! Could we be looking at a call for a restart of the above? *** My friends Jim and Betty Searcy took off from the US to the Eastern Mediterranean shortly after their associate Fritz Springmeir was arrested and subsequently disappeared. They knew the crunch was coming for all those who publicly exposed the New World Order. The latest victim is my longtime Christian supporter R.G. Stair. He has been removed by trumped up ugly charges against him. *** Dear Mr. Chamish, I didn't know if this report on R.G. Stair would, or would not, concern you. Mr. Stair was a friend of James Searcy, who is himself a great promoter of your writings... ChristianMediaDaily.com ***Great sites of readers, useful information.*** http://www.unabombers.com/file:///C:/Program%20Files/Macromedia/Dreamweaver%20MX/Working/Stargods/wrh@whatreallyhappened.com Chapter Five of my unpublished new book is up at: http://www.pushhamburger.com/barry_book_3.htm For French readers, a Christian site has translated my work into French. www.paroledevie.orgfile:///C:/Program%20Files/Macromedia/Dreamweaver%20MX/Working/Stargods/www.paroledevie.org An archive of my work is found at: http://www.redmoonrising.com/bclist.htm My books are on Amazon, or can be had through me, or by calling in the US, toll free: 1 877 RABINYY
|